MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3116050109 · doi:10.1109/tgcn.2020.3046140

Uplink Power Allocation for Throughput and Energy Efficiency Over Nakagami-<i>m</i> Fading Channels

2020· article· en· W3116050109 on OpenAlexafffund
Danh H. Ho, T. Aaron Gulliver

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNakagami distributionFadingThroughputComputer scienceMaximizationSignal-to-interference-plus-noise ratioMathematical optimizationMoment-generating functionTelecommunications linkPower (physics)MathematicsAlgorithmProbability distributionWirelessStatisticsTelecommunicationsDecoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, power allocation in cellular networks considering Nakagami- m fading is proposed. The objective is to optimize the network energy efficiency and throughput subject to user outage probability constraints. The moment generating function (MGF) is used to derive the exact outage probability over Nakagami- m fading channels. Further, tight upper and lower bounds on the outage probability are derived using the Weierstrass, Bernoulli and exponential inequalities. These bounds are used to characterize the relationship between outage probability and normalized signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR) in Nakagami- m fading. Power allocation algorithms for throughput maximization and energy efficiency are proposed. The throughput maximization problem has a logarithmic form so a differential method is used to solve this problem. The proposed energy efficiency problem has a nonconvex fractional program form so a parametric transformation is used to convert it to a subtractive optimization problem which can be solved iteratively. Simulation results are presented which show that the proposed schemes provide better performance than existing methods in terms of power consumption, throughput, energy efficiency and outage probability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.786

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Green Communications and NetworkingSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207