MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3116081071 · doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2020.11.111

Solar optical fiber daylighting system with an IR filter: Experimental and modeling studies

2020· article· en· W3116081071 on OpenAlexaff
Bouchaib Zazoum, Mouhammad El Hassan, A. Jendoubi

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Reports · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersPrince Mohammad Bin Fahd University
KeywordsMaterials scienceThermoplasticOptical fiberDaylightingSunlightOpticsComposite materialEngineeringArchitectural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solar daylighting system based on low cost thermoplastic optical fiber cables is one of essential and practicable option to save energy associated with electric lighting as well as enhance the visual comfort and human health by using natural solar lighting. In this present study a low-cost solar light system consisting of thermoplastic optical fibers, parabolic mirrored surface and sunlight collector with glass filter to block infrared (IR) radiation, was developed to bring natural sunlight into buildings. The effect of the IR filtration mechanism on the temperature of the thermoplastic optical fiber and the output illuminance, has been examined. The experimental results obviously show that the IR filter would protect the thermoplastic optical fiber from the overheat damage without affecting the output illuminance, which could extend the life time of the thermoplastic polymer optical fiber. Furthermore, an intelligent model based on deep learning neural network (DNN) algorithm was used to predict the temperature at the inlet surface of the thermoplastic optical fiber bundles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy ReportsSame topicBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationFrench-language works237,207