Les répercussions liées à la COVID-19 sur les processus d’admission en médecine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contexte et problématique : La pandémie de COVID-19 a causé de nombreuses perturbations dans les programmes de formation en amont des processus de sélection en médecine et a rendu difficile, voire impossible, l’utilisation de certains outils comme les entrevues en personne. Cette situation aura des répercussions importantes sur le choix et la validation des outils de sélection en médecine pour les années à venir, autant pour l’évaluation du rendement académique que pour l’évaluation des qualités personnelles. Analyse : Cette réflexion vise à évaluer dans quelle mesure ces impacts peuvent se faire sentir en utilisant comme référence le modèle de validation de Kane et propose certaines pistes de solution et d’investigation pour tirer des leçons de cette situation exceptionnelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.096 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.106 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".