The Clinical Spectrum of Primary Cutaneous CD4+ Small/Medium-Sized Pleomorphic T-Cell Lymphoproliferative Disorder: An Updated Systematic Literature Review and Case Series
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Primary cutaneous CD4+ small/medium pleomorphic T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder (SMPLPD) is a provisional entity within the 2016 World Health Organization classification of primary cutaneous lymphomas. The condition is currently classified as a lymphoproliferative disorder to emphasize its benign course and discourage aggressive, systemic treatment modalities. OBJECTIVE: To provide a relevant synthesis for the dermatological practitioner on the prevalence, presentation, and treatment of SMPLPD. METHODS: We conducted an updated systematic literature review and a retrospective chart review of diagnosed cases of SMPLPD from 2 Canadian academic cutaneous lymphoma centers. RESULTS: A total of 23 studies with 136 cases were extracted from the systematic review and 24 patients from our retrospective chart review. SMPLPD proved relatively common accounting for 12.5% of all cutaneous T-cell lymphomas encountered in our cutaneous lymphoma clinics, second in frequency only to mycosis fungoides. The typical clinical presentation was that of an older individual (median age 59 years) with an asymptomatic solitary lesion on their upper extremity. The most common clinical differentials were cutaneous lymphoid hyperplasia, basal cell carcinoma, and lymphoma unspecified. T follicular helper markers were reliably detected. The main treatment modalities were surgical excision, local radiation therapy, and topical or intralesional steroids. Cure was achieved in the vast majority of cases. CONCLUSIONS: SMPLPD is an underdiagnosed T-cell lymphoma with an overtly benign clinical course. The condition has an excellent prognosis and responds well to skin-directed therapies. Practitioners should be aware of this condition to avoid aggressive systemic treatments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.012 | 0.014 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".