Virtual Source Synthetic Aperture for Accurate Lateral Displacement Estimation in Ultrasound Elastography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ultrasound elastography (USE) is an emerging noninvasive imaging technique in which pathological alterations can be visualized by revealing the mechanical properties of the tissue. Estimating tissue displacement in all directions is required to accurately estimate the mechanical properties. Despite capabilities of elastography techniques in estimating displacement in both axial and lateral directions, estimation of axial displacement is more accurate than lateral direction due to higher sampling frequency, higher resolution, and having a carrier signal propagating in the axial direction. Among different ultrasound imaging techniques, synthetic aperture (SA) has better lateral resolution than others, but it is not commonly used for USE due to its limitation in imaging depth of field. Virtual source synthetic aperture (VSSA) imaging is a technique to implement SA beamforming on the focused transmitted data to overcome the limitation of SA in depth of field while maintaining the same lateral resolution as SA. Besides lateral resolution, VSSA has the capability of increasing sampling frequency in the lateral direction without interpolation. In this article, we utilize VSSA to perform beamforming to enable higher resolution and sampling frequency in the lateral direction. The beamformed data are then processed using our recently published elastography technique, OVERWIND. Simulation and experimental results show substantial improvement in the estimation of lateral displacements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".