MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Parameter uncertainty analysis for streamflow prediction in a cascade hydropower basin of southwest China

2020· article· en· W3116175174 on OpenAlexaff
Yanan Liang, Yanpeng Cai

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStreamflowGLUEHydropowerParticle swarm optimizationSurface runoffStructural basinUncertainty analysisSensitivity (control systems)Environmental scienceMathematicsWater resourcesHydrology (agriculture)Mathematical optimizationDrainage basinStatisticsGeographyEngineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Semi-distributed model of SWAT based on physical-chemical spatial information has been an effective tool for simulating hydrological cycle in the basin whereas it can’t completely restore all natural processes. Therefore, uncertainty analysis is needed to be conducted in order to achieve the reliability of the model. Yalong River Basin (YLRB), which is listed as the top ten hydropower bases in China, contains abundant water resources with plentiful runoff. Here a case study in YLRB was conducted to explore the parameter uncertainties of the SWAT model to runoff simulations based on multiple optimization algorithms. The following results were obtained: 1) setting the same objective function of Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency, three optimization methods including Sequential Uncertainty Fitting version 2 (SUFI-2), Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) all performed satisfactory fitting results and produced similar parameter ranges in YLRB, while SUFI-2 achieved better uncertainty analysis, followed by PSO and the last GLUE; 2) five general sensitive parameters to model output were ALPHA_BF, CH_K2, SOL_K(1), GW_REVAP and ESCO based on above three algorithms; 3) from the contribution network analysis in economics, the positive correlation between ALPHA_BF and CH_K2 exhibited the highest weight among all parameter relationships; and 4) the much lower sensitivity of parameter CN2 to streamflow in YLRB revealed that most commonly modified parameter CN2 was less applicable to land with adequate surface water than dry land. This work will be conducive to further hydrological analysis based on a reliable fitting model for this hydropower watershed. Additionally, this work will provide references and insights for sensitive parameter modification and prediction uncertainty reduction of streamflow simulation furthermore contributing to an optimal water resource management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.158

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies→French-language works237,207→