Mild Synthesis of Cyclohexanol and Cyclohexanone Via Electrocatalytic Reduction of Phenols Using Dispersed Metal Catalysts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone are industrially important chemicals for the synthesis of Nylon polymers. On the industrial scale, they are produced by thermocatalytic processes, either phenol hydrogenation (140–170 o C, 1 atm) or cyclohexane oxidation (140–180 o C, 0.8–2 MPa), which require high temperatures and external gas supply. This work demonstrates that electrosynthesis of cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone can be done at mild conditions using diverse aqueous electrolytes and dispersed metal catalysts (Pt/C, Ru/C, and Pd/C). Electrocatalytic hydrogenation (ECH) of lignin-derived phenols (e.g., guaiacol and phenol) is performed in a stirred slurry H-cell under potentiostatic or galvanostatic control. Dilute mineral acid (H 2 SO 4 , HClO 4 ), organic acid (CH 4 SO 3 ), and inorganic salt (NaCl) worked efficiently as the electrolyte solutions. In the ECH of guaiacol at low temperatures (35–40 o C) and low Pt/C loading, high guaiacol conversions (83–96%) and Faradaic efficiencies (40–70%) were achieved with significant cyclohexanol selectivities (45–53%) after 4 h reactions. In the ECH of phenol, full conversion to cyclohexanol was achieved after 2 h with high current efficiency (90%). Remarkably, by pairing the NaCl catholyte and H 2 SO 4 anolyte, the activity of Ru/C and Pd/C can be dramatically improved, showing the importance of electrocatalyst and electrolyte synergy in the ECH of phenolic compounds. The stirred slurry catalyst allows the cell to operate at the industrially relevant current densities (in this work, between 100–300 mA cm -2 ). Dispersion of the negatively charged catalyst particles in the solution also facilitates the mass transfer between the organic molecules and chemisorbed hydrogens through physical collisions during the reaction, thereby improving the ECH efficiency. Mild electrocatalytic reduction of phenolic compounds represents a promising route for selective and efficient production of renewable chemicals from biomass.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".