A Double-Stage Phase Hit Mitigation Scheme In Microwave Backhaul Links
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The oscillator phase hit (PH) results in a temporary link loss in the communication system and bears an expensive cost on the operator companies. In this work, we propose a double-stage solution to mitigate the PH. In the first stage, we use Neyman-Pearson binary hypothesis testing to develop a low-cost PH detection algorithm, in which a likelihood ratio test is designed, and the optimal detection threshold is analytically calculated. The proposed PH detection scheme entails small real-time computations while using the existing pilot symbols in the system. Hence, no extra pilot overhead is required. In the second stage, the maximum likelihood (ML) estimation is used to develop a PH correction scheme. In particular, the phase noise and the PH are jointly mitigated by solving an ML estimation problem. By applying the proposed correction scheme, the number of remaining erroneous symbols due to PH (if any) is within the error correction capability of modern forward error-correcting codes. Numerical results verify the effectiveness of the proposed scheme in detecting and correcting the PH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".