Des images en quête de sens. “Par les écrans du monde” de Fanny Taillandier
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans notre article nous nous proposons d’analyser le traitement de l’espace dans le dernier roman de Fanny Taillandier Par les écrans du monde (2018). Dans ses descriptions de la ville bouleversée par le cataclysme, Taillandier met en œuvre une série de stratégies stylistiques qui, dans l’esthétisation de l’horreur, lui redonnent paradoxalement un sens: la fragmentation de l’espace et sa recomposition passent en effet par une peinture verbale où l’image trouve une ‘consistance’ que la “modélisation numérique” ne peut pas représenter, alors qu’elle est à même de concevoir un “chaos” qui nous est inaccessible. Nous nous servirons pour notre analyse du cadre théorique de la géopoétique, telle qu’elle a été élaborée par Kenneth White, Michel Collot et par l’équipe canadienne de Marcello Vitali-Rosati et Servanne Montjour.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".