MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3116279287 · doi:10.17771/pucrio.ateo.50709

OS MOVIMENTOS POPULARES NO MAGISTÉRIO SOCIAL DO PAPA FRANCISCO

2020· article· pt· W3116279287 on OpenAlexaff
Paulo Fernando Carneiro de Andrade

Bibliographic record

VenueAtualidade Teológica · 2020
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion and Society in Latin America
Canadian institutionsContinental (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Entre 2014 e 2016 ocorreram três encontros do Papa Francisco com lideranças dos Movimentos Populares, organizados a pedido do Pontífice. Estes encontros, aqui analisados, constituem uma novidade e são expressão do novo paradigma que o Papa Francisco instaura na Doutrina Social da Igreja, onde emerge como elemento central a Opção Preferencial pelos Pobres na perspectiva desenvolvida pelo Episcopado Latino Americano de Medellín à Aparecida. Segundo esta perspectiva a Opção pelos Pobres possui dois elementos centrais. O primeiro é o que trata da mudança de lugar social, a identificação com o olhar do pobre, seus sofrimentos, alegrias e anseios, e o segundo refere-se a criar condições para que o pobre emerja como sujeito eclesial e sujeito social, ou seja, para que se torne sujeito da evangelização e protagonista das necessárias mudanças sociais. Nesta perspectiva, para o Papa Francisco os Movimentos Sociais são parte da Sociedade Civil e através deles os pobres se constituem como sujeitos fundamentais das necessárias transformações sociais que levem a uma superação da atual economia globalizada que, segundo o Papa, Mata, Exclui e Destrói a Mãe Terra, transformando o dinheiro em um ídolo ao qual tudo deve ser sacrificado.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtualidade TeológicaSame topicReligion and Society in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207