MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3116329096 · doi:10.46503/pcmp9095

Socially responsible investment: A view from the social rating agencies of Vigeo-Eiris and MSCI ESG STATS

2018· article· en· W3116329096 on OpenAlexaff
Jairo González-Bueno, Jairo Núñez Rodríguez

Bibliographic record

VenueFinance Markets and Valuation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicSustainable Finance and Green Bonds
Canadian institutionsAdidas (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorporate social responsibilityAccountingCorporate governanceInvestment (military)BusinessSocial responsibilityProcess (computing)FinancePublic relationsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The concern of investors for environmental, social and corporate governance issues is giving rise to certain changes in the investment decision-making process. Given this situation, socially responsible investment has received the attention of practitioners and academics, and has reached a significant level of development in financial community in recent years. The main goal of this paper is to examine social rating methodologies developed by the two most renowned agencies worldwide: MSCI ESG STATS and Vigeo-Eiris.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.582
Threshold uncertainty score0.518

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFinance Markets and ValuationSame topicSustainable Finance and Green BondsFrench-language works237,207