La mémoire collective du Parti apriste péruvien comme outil de cohésion politique interne, 1931-1959
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article s’intéresse à la mémoire collective du Parti apriste péruvien (PAP) comme outil de cohésion interne et d’instrumentation idéologique. Il démontre comment la direction du parti sut déployer, et constamment réinventer, une mémoire collective de groupe de façon à maintenir l’unité au sein des rangs apristes entre les années 1930 et 1950. Cet article conçoit la mémoire apriste comme un ensemble de caractéristiques physiques et morales que la direction du parti transmit aux partisans du groupe avec le soutien de marqueurs symboliques. Cette stratégie permit à la direction d’ancrer dans une notion de continuité les nombreux changements idéologiques qui pourtant sous-tendirent l’évolution de ce mouvement populiste au Pérou.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".