MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3116378151 · doi:10.1017/s0022046920001785

Catholics and the Third Reich. Controversies and debate. Edited by Karl-Joseph Hummel and Michael Kissener and translated by Christof Morrisey. Pp. 315 incl. 12 black-and-white and colour ills, 3 colour maps and 1 table. Leiden: Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh 2018. €79. 978 3 506 78786 6

2020· article· en· W3116378151 on OpenAlexaff
Lauren Faulkner Rossi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Ecclesiastical History · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Religious Studies of Rome
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhite (mutation)HistoryArt historyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Catholics and the Third Reich. Controversies and debate. Edited by Karl-Joseph Hummel and Michael Kissener and translated by Christof Morrisey. Pp. 315 incl. 12 black-and-white and colour ills, 3 colour maps and 1 table. Leiden: Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh 2018. €79. 978 3 506 78786 6 - Volume 72 Issue 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.329
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Ecclesiastical HistorySame topicHistorical and Religious Studies of RomeFrench-language works237,207