Fully Dynamic Sequential and Distributed Algorithms for MAX-CUT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper initiates the study of the MAX-CUT problem in fully dynamic graphs. Given a graph G = (V,E), we present deterministic fully dynamic distributed and sequential algorithms to maintain a cut on G which always contains at least |E|/2 edges in sublinear update time under edge insertions and deletions to G. Our results include the following deterministic algorithms: i) an O(Δ) worst-case update time sequential algorithm, where Δ denotes the maximum degree of G, ii) the first fully dynamic distributed algorithm taking O(1) rounds and O(Δ) total bits of communication per update in the Massively Parallel Computation (MPC) model with n machines and O(n) words of memory per machine. The aforementioned algorithms require at most one adjustment, that is, a move of one vertex from one side of the cut to the other. We also give the following fully dynamic sequential algorithms: i) a deterministic O(m^{1/2}) amortized update time algorithm where m denotes the maximum number of edges in G during any sequence of updates and, ii) a randomized algorithm which takes Õ(n^{2/3}) worst-case update time when edge updates come from an oblivious adversary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".