MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3116518434 · doi:10.34128/jra.v3i2.62

ANALISIS Z-SCORE DALAM MENGUKUR KINERJA KEUANGAN UNTUK MEMPREDIKSI KEBANGKRUTAN PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19

2020· article· en· W3116518434 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kristina Dewanti Setyaningrum, Apriani Dorkas Rambu Atahau, Imanuel Madea Sakti

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Riset Akuntansi Politala · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicManagement and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)BankruptcyBusinessCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)DefaultBusiness administrationAccountingActuarial scienceFinanceMedicineHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A manufacturing company is a business entity whose main activity is to process raw materials into finished goods, therefore they have a sale value. During the covid-19 pandemic, many manufacturing companies were threatened with bankruptcy. That is because the company’s performance has decreased. The purpose of this research is to compare how big the opportunities of PT. Astra International, PT. Mandom Indonesia, PT. Gudang Garam, and PT. Sri Rejeki Isman bankruptcy as a result of covid-19 by using the Altman z-score model. Financial distress is a situation where a company experiences liquidity difficulties or the ability to fulfill its obligations. Based on the results of PT. Astra International from 2016 to 2020 in the first quarter was potentially bankruptcy, while in the second quarter the company was based on the grey area. PT. Mandom Indonesia both in the first quarter and second quarter in healthy. PT. Gudang Garam in first quarter and second quarter in the grey area. PT. Sri Rejeki Isman in the first quarter and second quarter classified as a potentially bankrupt company.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Riset Akuntansi PolitalaSame topicManagement and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207