Compliance of the Eu Legal Acts With Montreal Convention (Mc99) on Universal Liability Regime for International Carriage by Air-Importance for Sustainable Tourism Worldwide
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Entire set of the different international treaty regimes covering airline liability that had developed since 1929 has been unified by this Convention into a single legal act regulating airline liability worldwide.Thus, importance of such a regulation and protection of passenger's rights is obvious in terms of sustainable tourism development and consistency.Significance of the Montreal Convention (in further text: MC99) has been recognized not only by individual states globally, but also by the European Union itself.According to Chapter VII, Article 53, the MC99 is open for signature not only by single states, but also by any Regional Economic Integration Organizations.The EU has taken advantage over that opportunity and introduced Regulation 889/2002 which fully corresponds to the MC99.Recognizing some shortcomings, the EU made amendments and introduced the Regulation 261/2004.This article aims to focus on compliance of the EU legal acts with the MC99, in cases of passenger' s death or injury, delay in scheduled routes, denied boarding, upgrading and downgrading in cases the air carrier places a passenger in a seat not previously reserved by the passenger.This means that authors have focused on protection of passengers' rights and support for sustainable tourism development worldwide.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.013 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".