The taxonomy and conservation status of <i>Isoetes</i> (Isoetaceae; Lycopodiopsida) in India
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In many cases over the years the diversity of Isoetes in India has been defined by inconsistent morphological analyses and questionable data. This has resulted in substantial confusion, dramatically different taxonomic interpretations and a low level of global acceptance. That in turn has prevented the reliable determination of conservation priorities. The present study reviews the most reliable morphological, distributional and cytological Indian data available with techniques and standards that have guided successful taxonomic investigations of Isoetes elsewhere in the world. This results in the enumeration of nine readily distinguishable species for India. One named hybrid is also discussed as is the probable occurrence of other unnamed hybrids. All Indian Isoetes species except I. coromandelina subsp. coromandelina are endemic. Two possible but unresolved taxa are also discussed. A clearer determination of the highest national priorities for Isoetes conservation has resulted. Most Indian taxa are rare, some qualifying as Endangered and others probably being extinct. Suggestions for conservation strategies and actions to protect and sustain vulnerable Isoetes species and their habitats are offered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".