MAGLeak: A Learning-Based Side-Channel Attack for Password Recognition With Multiple Sensors in IIoT Environment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As an emerging technology, industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) connects massive sensors and actuators to empower industrial sectors being smart, autonomous, efficient, and safety. However, due the large number of build-in sensors of IIoT smart devices, the IIoT systems are vulnerable to side-channel attack. In this article, a novel side-channel-based passwords cracking system, namely MAGLeak, is proposed to recognize the victim's passwords by leveraging accelerometer, gyroscope, and magnetometer of IIoT touch-screen smart device. Specifically, an event-driven data collection method is proposed to ensure that the user's keystroke behavior can be reflected accurately by the obtained measurements of three sensors. Moreover, random forest algorithm is leveraged for the recognition module, followed by a data preprocessing process. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that MAGLeak achieves a high recognition accuracy under small training dataset, e.g., achieving recognition accuracy 98% of each single key for 2000 training samples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it