MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3116703576 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-02332147mtgabs

Microporous Layer Design for High Performing Open-Cathode Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells

2020· article· en· W3116703576 on OpenAlexaff
Anand Sagar, Sachin Chugh, Alok Sharma, Erik Kjeang

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProton exchange membrane fuel cellCathodeMaterials scienceOverheating (electricity)ElectrolyteMembrane electrode assemblyMicroporous materialNuclear engineeringCurrent collectorChemical engineeringElectrodeComposite materialChemistryElectrical engineeringEngineeringFuel cells

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) are a key sustainable energy source which can cater for energy demands ranging from miniature power requirements to portable, automotive and various stationary power applications. PEMFCs deliver electricity by means of undergoing electrochemical reactions and produce water and heat as by-products. At high current densities, flooding and overheating can cause local hot spots leading to degradation and failure of the membrane electrode assembly (MEA) during long term operations [1]. Hence, hygrothermal management is normally ensured by means of liquid cooling of the bipolar plates. However, this traditional design incurs extra cost of balance-of-plant (BOP) components and enhances the overall size of the system. Using ambient air as oxidant as well as coolant with an ‘open-cathode’ design can drastically reduce the system size and weight, however the performance of such a system is limited by overheating and drying of the MEA. The objective of the present work is to develop a suitable microporous layer (MPL) design for efficient cell performance of an open-cathode PEMFC system operating at hot ambient air conditions. A pre-validated comprehensive, 3D computational fuel cell model [2] is used to study the mass, momentum and heat balance inside the system along with water transport and current distribution in various components of the system. The gas diffusion layer (GDL) comprised of a bi-layer macroporous substrate and MPL structure is one of the key components of the overall system design and plays a significant role in water transport inside the cells [3]. Whereas in conventional liquid-cooled systems, the presence of a hydrophobic MPL can facilitate wicking of liquid water out of the MEA to prevent oversaturation and flooding [4], ‘open-cathode’ fuel cells are more likely to experience drying than flooding and may therefore benefit from alternate MPL designs. As shown in Figure 1, thinner MPLs (30 μm) with higher porosity (60%) are found to result in elevated open-cathode cell performance as a result of optimum water retention and O2 diffusion across the MPL. The increment in performance is found to be broadly visible at higher current densities, where mass transport effects are more dominant. The MPL effective diffusivity which is a function of its porosity along with the MPL thickness are also found to be important for the overall thermal and water balance of the MEA. The optimum RH and temperature levels achieved in the MEA are further found to negate the overheating and drying effects obtained in earlier system designs. Acknowledgments This work was supported by the funding provided by Simon Fraser University and Indian Oil R&D Centre under the SFU-IOCL joint PhD program in clean energy. References [1] S. Shahsavari, A. Desouza, M. Bahrami, and E. Kjeang, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 37, no. 23, pp. 18261–18271, 2012. [2] I01B-1486, A. Sagar, S. Chugh, A. Sharma, and E. Kjeang, in 236th ECS Meeting (October 13-17, 2019), 2019. [3] K. Kang and H. Ju, J. Power Sources, vol. 194, no. 2, pp. 763–773, 2009. [4] U. Pasaogullari and C. Y. Wang, Electrochim. Acta, vol. 49, no. 25, pp. 4359–4369, 2004. Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting Abstracts→Same topicFuel Cells and Related Materials→French-language works237,207→