O uso de Metodologias Ativas no processo de aprendizagem: ensino disruptivo na graduação
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar o desempenho de alunos do curso de Administracao, na disciplina de Metodos Quantitativos Aplicados a Gestao, que aborda especificamente os conteudos de estatistica. Para isso, foi feito um estudo de duas turmas, em uma se trabalhou um semestre com metodologias ativas: Peer Instruction, Flipped Classroom e Hands-on-Tec ; e na outra com ensino tradicional, com aulas expositivas e avaliacoes convencionais (prova). Foi utilizada pesquisa bibliografica para embasamento teorico, aplicacao de questionario para auferir a percepcao da turma quanto ao uso das metodologias ativas com uso das TICs, e teste-t independente, com teste de Levene para igualdade de variância. Os testes evidenciaram que a turma que trabalhou com as metodologias ativas apresentou resultados diferentes, e superior na media das notas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it