MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3116899540 · doi:10.1101/2020.12.21.423814

Age-related reductions in the number of serial sarcomeres contribute to shorter fascicle lengths but not elevated passive tension

2020· preprint· en· W3116899540 on OpenAlexaff
Geoffrey A. Power, Sean Crooks, Jared R. Fletcher, Brian R. MacIntosh, Walter Herzog

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle Physiology and Disorders
Canadian institutionsMount Royal UniversityUniversity of GuelphUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSarcomereFascicleMuscle architectureAnatomyReduction (mathematics)Gastrocnemius muscleMyofibrilChemistrySkeletal muscleMedicineMyocyteMathematicsInternal medicineGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We investigated age-related changes to fascicle length (F L ), sarcomere length (SL), and serial sarcomere number (SSN), and how this affects passive force. Following mechanical testing to determine passive force, the medial gastrocnemius muscle of young ( n= 9) and old ( n= 8) Fisher 344BN hybrid rats was chemically fixed at the optimal muscle length for force production; individual fascicles were dissected for length measurement, and laser diffraction was used to assess SL. Old rats had ∼14% shorter F L than young, which was driven by a ∼10% reduction in SSN, with no difference in SL (∼4%). Passive force was greater in the old compared to young rats at long muscle lengths. Shorter F L and reduced SSN in the old rats could not entirely explain increased passive forces for absolute length changes, owing to a slight reduction in SL in old, resulting in similar SL at long muscle lengths. Summary Statement This study sought to explain the increased passive tension observed for muscles of older individuals owing to age-related changes to muscle architecture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicMuscle Physiology and DisordersFrench-language works237,207