MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3116911287 · doi:10.4000/books.pup.24444

Dire ou ne pas dire

2013· book-chapter· fr· W3116911287 on OpenAlexaff
Marie-Christine Pioffet

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires de Provence eBooks · 2013
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Comme le rappelle Pierre Ronzeaud dans sa magnifique introduction à la Terre australe connue, « la création de la cité idéale » procède de « l’inventivité verbale », étroitement liée à la production utopique. Autant dire que la communication entre utopiens et visiteurs est une question incontournable pour l’étude du voyage imaginaire, comme le révèle de manière exemplaire le séjour de Jacques Sadeur chez les Australiens hermaphrodites. Il est toutefois hors de mon propos et de ma compétence ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.007
Scholarly communication0.0060.008
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires de Provence eBooksSame topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207