Hubungan Status Gizi Dan Ekonomi Dengan Perkembangan Motorik Halus Anak Usia 2 Sampai 3 Tahun Di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Lima Kaum 1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstrak Latarbelakang:Perkembangan kemampuan motorik balita akan sangat membantu untuk melakukan eksplorasi dan mempraktikan kemampuan yang baru. BerdasarkanHasil observasi didapatkanbeberapaanak tidak dapat melakukan tahapan perkembangan motorik halusnya seperti anak usia 2 tahun sebanyak 3 orang anak tidak dapat memegang sendiri gelas. Dan anak usia 3 tahun sebanyak 4 orang anak tidak bisa membuat garis sesuai dengan perintah. Tujuan: Penelitian ini untuk mengetahui hubungan status gizi dan ekonomidengan perkembangan motorik halus anak usia2 sampai 3 di wilayah kerja puskesmas Lima Kaum1. Metode:Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif analitik dengan jenis penelitian kuantitatif dan pendekatan cross sectional. Populasi pada penelitian ini yaitu sebanyak 110 orang anakusia 2-3 tahun dan sampelnya 50 orang, cara pengambilan sampel dengan menggunakan Metode AccidentalSampling. Penelitian dilakukan pada bulan Oktober 2017. Pengukuran data dilakukan dengan menggunakan kuesioner dan wawancara. Analisis data pada penelitian ini menggunakan distribusi frekuensi dan ujiChi-square. Hasil:Diketahui responden yang memiliki status gizibaik (58%), ekonomi tinggi (56%) dan perkembangan motorik halus sesuai (52%). Hasil uji statistic menunjukkan adanya hubungan yang bermakna antara status gizi(p = 0,002)nilai OR 8,400 dan ekonomi (p = 0,025) nilai OR 4,524 dengan perkembangan motorik halus anak usia 2-3 tahun. Kesimpulan: dari penelitian ini adalah terdapat hubungan yang bermakna antara status gizi dan ekonomi dengan perkembangan motorik halus anak usia 2-3 tahun. Oleh karena itu tingkat ekonomi dapat mempengaruhiperkembangan motorik halus pada anak, orang tua yang memiliki tingkat ekonomi yang tinggi cenderung memiliki anak dengan perkembangan motorik halussesuai. Disarankan kepada orang tua agardapat memberikan asupan makanan bergizi seimbang untuk anaknya. Kata Kunci : Ekonomi, perkembanganmotorikhalus, status gizi Abstract: Background: Growth and development is a dynamic process throughout human life. Based on the observation results obtained some children can not do the stages of fine motor development like 2-year-old child as much as 3 children can not hold their own glass. And children aged 3 years as many as 4 children can not make lines in accordance with the command. Objective:This study aims to determine the relationship between nutritional and economic status with the smooth motor development of children aged 2 to 3 working area of Puskesmas Lima Kaum 1. Method:This research uses descriptive analytic method with quantitative research type and cross sectional approach. The population in this study were as many as 110 children aged 2-3 years and samples of 50 people, the way of sampling using Accidental Sampling Method. The study was conducted October 2017. The data were measured using questionnaires and interviews. Data analysis in this research use frequency distribution and Chi-square test.Results:Known respondents who have good nutritional status (58%), high economy (56%) and smooth motor development appropriate (52%). The result of statistical test shows that there is a significant correlation between nutritional status (p = 0,002) OR 8,400 and economic value (p = 0,025) OR value 4.524 with fine motor development of 2-3 year oldchild.The conclusion of this study is that there is a significant relationship between nutritional status and economy with the smooth motor development of children aged 2-3 years. Therefore of that economic level can affect the smooth motor development in children, parents who have high economic rates tend to have children with appropriate fine motor development. It is recommended to parents to be able to provide balanced nutritious food intake for theirchild Keywords : Economics, smooth motor development, nutritional status
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".