Resource Management Based on Reinforcement Learning for D2D Communication in Cellular Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, the integration of Device-to-Device (D2D) communication to cellular networks became a vitality task with the growth of mobile devices, as well as requirements of enhanced network performance in terms of spectral efficiency, energy efficiency, and latency. In this paper, we propose a spectrum allocation framework based on Reinforcement Learning (RL) for joint mode selection, channel assignment, and power control in D2D communication. The objective is to maximize the overall throughput of the network while ensuring the quality of transmission and guaranteeing low latency requirements of D2D communications. The proposed algorithm uses reinforcement learning (RL) based on Markov Decision Process (MDP) with a proposed new reward function to learn the policy by interacting with the D2D environment. An Actor-Critic Reinforcement Learning (AC-RL) approach is then used to solve the resource management problem. The simulation results show that our learning method performs well, can greatly improve the sum rate of D2D links, and converges quickly, compared with the algorithms in the literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".