MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3116979700 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-02372392mtgabs

Supported Transition Metal Phosphides: Activity Survey for HER, ORR, OER, and Corrosion Resistance in Acid and Alkaline Electrolytes

2020· article· en· W3116979700 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
KeywordsCatalysisChemistryElectrolyteElectrochemistryCorrosionInorganic chemistryHydrogen peroxideAlkaline fuel cellMetalElectrochemical energy conversionOxygen evolutionTransition metalOrganic chemistryElectrodePhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the main bottle necks for the introduction of fuel cell technology in the market, is their dependency on precious metals as catalyst. Focusing on the electrochemical reactions involved, the most sluggish is the Oxygen Reduction Reaction (ORR). Significant research has been performed to optimize for the amount of the precious metal used, whilst keeping the same activity. On the other hand, many investigations have been carried out to find non-precious metal catalysts with the same performance for ORR, Oxygen Evolution Reaction (OER), Hydrogen Evolution Reaction (HER) and Hydrogen Oxidation Reaction (HOR) [1]. One of those candidates are the metal phosphides [2], however, these catalysts nowadays only are active for ORR, HER, OER and they have very poor activity towards the HOR [3]. Here we present the work done related to the simple synthesis of different MP catalysts (M = Ni, Co, W, Cr and Mo) [4]; their catalytic activity towards H 2 and O 2 reactions; and their corrosion resistance in acidic and alkaline electrolytes. Co 2 P was found to have a very interesting ORR catalytic behaviour and peroxide generation under alkaline and acidic conditions respectively. To understand the activity of Co 2 P, an HRTEM analysis was done to understand the changes in the morphology before and after the ORR reaction. References [1] M. S. Faber and S. Jin, “Earth-abundant inorganic electrocatalysts and their nanostructures for energy conversion applications,” Energy Environ. Sci. , vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 3519–3542, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1039/C4EE01760A. [2] A.-M. Alexander et al. , “Alternative catalytic materials: carbides, nitrides, phosphides and amorphous boron alloys,” Chem. Soc. Rev. , vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 4388–4401, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1039/b916787k. [3] R. Prins and M. E. Bussell, “Metal Phosphides: Preparation, Characterization and Catalytic Reactivity,” Catal. Letters , vol. 142, no. 12, pp. 1413–1436, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1007/s10562-012-0929-7. [4] A. Parra-Puerto, K. L. Ng, K. Fahy, A. E. Goode, M. P. Ryan, and A. Kucernak, “Supported Transition Metal Phosphides: Activity Survey for HER, ORR, OER, and Corrosion Resistance in Acid and Alkaline Electrolytes,” ACS Catal. , vol. 9, pp. 11515–11529, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1021/acscatal.9b03359. Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it