MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3117153088 · doi:10.5951/tcm.17.5.0286

Math by the Month: A trip to the Zoo

2010· article· en· W3117153088 on OpenAlexaff
Annette Ricks Leitze, J.B. Adams, Asheley S. Alexander, Ian A. Gray, Holly Hampton, Susan E. Janke, Antoinette M. Stith

Bibliographic record

VenueTeaching Children Mathematics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Physics and Python Applications
Canadian institutionsIntertek (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJungleField tripWildlifeThe ImaginaryMathematics educationEndangered speciesGeographyPsychologyEcologySociologyDemographyArchaeologyBiologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most of us will never be up close and personal with exotic wildlife or endangered species. However, with an active imagination, a field trip can become a jungle safari. This month, join our imaginary mathematical zoo trip.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.365
Threshold uncertainty score0.905

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3650.215

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTeaching Children MathematicsSame topicComputational Physics and Python ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207