Measurement error models reveal the scale of consumer movements along an isoscape gradient
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In isotopic studies of mobile consumers, measurement error in spatial location is almost inevitable when individuals are observed only once. This error can have considerable impacts on the interpretation of ecologically important features, such as individual movement behaviour and dietary niche breadth. This study introduces a measurement error modelling framework for estimating movement scale and isotopic fractionation for consumers that move and feed along a linear isoscape gradient. The model assumes that the key mechanism underlying the difference in spatial isotopic regression slopes of mobile consumers and their baseline resources is the presence of measurement error in the spatial location of consumers. Measurement error is assumed to arise from consumer movements, which are represented by realistic movement kernels. Simulations with known parameter values are used to evaluate the performance of the models under scenarios involving different combinations of consumer mobility and sample size. Several variants of the model are fit to empirical data, and their parameter estimates are compared with those of alternative models. In simulations with known parameter values, model estimates of movement scale converged to the known values and had substantially smaller bias and variance than those of alternative models. Estimates of movement scale and fractionation for empirical data were consistent with previously reported estimates. Neglecting measurement error in spatial location is likely to hinder progress in spatial isotopic analyses. The proposed framework provides a statistically principled basis for incorporating measurement error in spatial location into isoscape analyses to provide improved estimates of parameters of interest, such as movement scale and fractionation. The framework is sufficiently general to be applicable to a variety of species, isotopic tracers, environments and spatial scales. Logical next steps to extend the framework could involve modelling of multiple species, nonlinear isoscape gradients and 2‐dimensional isoscapes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".