MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3117285346 · doi:10.1142/s0219498822500633

Duplication methods for embeddings of real division algebras

2020· article· en· W3117285346 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Algebra and Its Applications · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic and Geometric Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnitalMathematicsDivision (mathematics)Division algebraAlgebra over a fieldPure mathematicsCombinatoricsDiscrete mathematicsAlgebra representationArithmetic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We introduce two groups of duplication processes that extend the well known Cayley–Dickson process. The first one allows to embed every [Formula: see text]-dimensional (4D) real unital algebra [Formula: see text] into an 8D real unital algebra denoted by [Formula: see text] We also find the conditions on [Formula: see text] under which [Formula: see text] is a division algebra. This covers the most classes of known [Formula: see text]D real division algebras. The second process allows us to embed particular classes of [Formula: see text]D RDAs into [Formula: see text]D RDAs. Besides, both duplication processes give an infinite family of non-isomorphic [Formula: see text]D real division algebras whose derivation algebras contain [Formula: see text].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.684
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it