Hydro-Québec’s new approach for asset management
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie (HQT) has been employing predictive modelling methods to manage its assets for over a decade. To meet new needs and to respond to changes in the energy market, HQT undertakes an important research project in order to improve existing tools for asset management and modelling system. In this paper, we present a quick review of the global asset management model at HQT. Furthermore, we introduce a Contingency Analysis (CA) approach which will be integrated in the reliability simulator module of the HQT global asset management model. To this end, we augment the traditional bus-branch data model to provide a detailed node-breaker representation that contains detailed nodes, breakers and other switching devices. Then, we analyze the impact of the equipment unavailability on the network behaviour using a detailed CA approach. This contingency analysis approach not only informs the asset management engineers in case of violations, but also suggests several remedial actions to eliminate the violation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it