MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3117443718 · doi:10.1649/0010-065x-74.4.897

An Integrative Taxonomic Review of the Quedius erythrogaster Mannerheim Species Group in North America (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Quediini)

2020· article· en· W3117443718 on OpenAlexaff
Adam Brunke, A. Zmudzinska, Joel Buffam

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Coleopterists Bulletin · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicColeoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNearctic ecozoneBiologySpecies groupDNA barcodingCladeEcologyPhylogenetic treeZoologySpecies complexTaxonomy (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Like many other members of the Microsaurus Dejean lineage of Quedius Stephens (Staphylinidae: Staphylininae: Quediini), rove beetles of the erythrogaster species group are facultatively or obligately associated with microhabitats within the nests of insects, mammals and, possibly, tree cavity-nesting birds. Generally, these cryptic and difficult to access microhabitats have been poorly surveyed in North America compared to Central Europe. This has resulted in limited material for taxonomists and several species likely remain to be discovered. Here we review species concepts in the erythrogaster group using newly available Nearctic material, including some extensive samples from mammal burrows. Using evidence from both morphological and CO1 barcode data, we propose the treatment of eight species, including four new species: Quedius alesi Brunke, new species, Quedius miltoni Brunke, new species, Quedius pinetis Brunke, new species, and Quedius praticola Brunke, new species. A phylogenetic analysis of the molecular data resolved two major clades within the erythrogaster group, the erythrogaster and compransor complexes. It also corroborated morphological evidence that Palearctic myrmecophile Quedius brevis Erichson belongs to the erythrogaster group and suggests that other Palearctic species could belong here upon further examination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Coleopterists BulletinSame topicColeoptera Taxonomy and DistributionFrench-language works237,207