MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3117461039 · doi:10.9734/ajocs/2020/v8i419059

What Principle Governs the Chemical Dynamic/Kinetic Process?

2020· article· en· W3117461039 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Journal of Chemical Sciences · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiofield Effects and Biophysics
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemical reactionKinetic energyWork (physics)Chemical kineticsProcess (computing)Chemical reaction kineticsChemistryComputational chemistryThermodynamicsBiochemical engineeringComputer scienceKineticsPhysicsClassical mechanicsEngineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work uncovered is the basic principle governing the chemical reaction dynamic/kinetic process of chemical reaction (kt=4.6 and Ea/RT=4.6), which is ignored before. Based on the “yin and yang” philosophy (see appendix A), the discovered principle has been elucidated clearly. In addition, we also demonstrate: 1. how to optimize the condition of chemical reaction, such as reaction time and temperature; 2. how to suppress the side chemical reaction. Furthermore the potential application of the discovered principle has been discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score0.182

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it