MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3117596129 · doi:10.3390/app11010086

Simplified Welch Algorithm for Spectrum Monitoring

2020· article· en· W3117596129 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Hossein, Gabriel Gandubert, Gabriel Gleeton, P. Ivanov, René Landry

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Sciences · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFast Fourier transformAlgorithmSpectral densityComputer scienceField-programmable gate arrayReduction (mathematics)MathematicsComputer hardwareTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Power Spectral Density (PSD) is an essential representation of the signal spectrum that depicts the power measurement content versus frequency. PSD is typically used to characterize broadband random signals and has a variety of usages in many fields like physics, engineering, biomedical, etc. This paper proposes a simple and practical method to estimate the PSD based on the Welch algorithm for spectrum monitoring. The proposed method can be easily implemented in most of software-based systems or low-level Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) and yields a smooth overview of the spectrum. The original Welch method utilizes the average of the amplitude squared of the previous Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) samples for better estimation of frequency components and noise reduction. Replacing the simple moving average with a weighted moving average can significantly reduce the complexity of the Welch’s method. In this way, the amount of required Random Access Memory (RAM) is reduced from K (where K is the number of FFT packets in averaging) to one. This new method allows users to adjust the dependency of the PSD on the previous observed FFTs and its smoothness by setting only one feedback parameter without any hardware change. The obtained results show that the algorithm gives a clear spectrum, even in the noisy situation because of the significant Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) enhancement. The trade-off between spectrum accuracy and time convergence of the modified algorithm is also fully analysed. In addition, a simple solution based on Xilinx Intellectual Property (IP), which converts the proposed method to a practical spectrum analyzer device, is presented. This modified algorithm is validated by comparing it with two standard and reliable spectrum analyzers, Rohde & Schwarz (R&S) and Tektronix RSA600. The modified design can track any signal type as the other spectrum analyzers, and it has better performance in situations where the power of the desired signal is weak or where the signal is mixed with the background noise. It can display the spectrum when the input signal power is 5 dB lower than the visible threshold level of R&S and Tektronix. In both narrowband and wideband scenarios, the new implemented design can still display frequency components 5 dB higher than the noise, while the output spectrum of other analyzers is completely covered by noise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied SciencesSame topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207