MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3117611881 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-02453777mtgabs

High-Throughput Screening of Na-Ion Cathodes

2020· article· en· W3117611881 on OpenAlexaff
Eric McCalla

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThroughputCathodeBattery (electricity)Yield (engineering)Materials scienceCharacterization (materials science)Cyclic voltammetryTernary operationPrecipitationPhase (matter)Mixing (physics)IonBlock (permutation group theory)NanotechnologyChemical engineeringComputer scienceElectrodeChemistryElectrochemistryPhysicsMetallurgyPhysical chemistryEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the search for better performing battery materials, high-throughput approaches have the potential to screen large composition spaces in a short period of time and thereby greatly accelerate the development of advanced materials. The challenges are numerous both in terms of synthesis which is often done at much smaller scale than in commercial settings (e.g. milligrams) and in terms of characterization. Herein, we develop high-throughput synthesis of Na-ion cathodes in the Na-Mn-Fe-O pseudo-ternary system. The sol-gel approach is adapted to high-throughput and shows that single-phase materials are made whereas co-precipitation does not yield sufficiently intimate mixing of the cations and phase separation occurs. The samples made by sol-gel are further characterized using both X-ray diffraction and cyclic voltammetry (both in high-throughput) and yield results that match up very well with those obtained by making bulk amounts of the samples. This demonstrates scale-up of the combinatorial results will be possible. Preliminary data on the entire Na-Mn-Fe-O pseudoternary system will be shown for the first time revealing the structure-property relations taking place in this important system. This work will serve as both a screening tool and also help guide future research in the design of Na-ion cathodes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting Abstracts→Same topicAdvancements in Battery Materials→French-language works237,207→