MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3117665311

O DISCURSO DESTRUTIVO DO CAPITAL E A CRISE DA PANDEMIA

2020· article· pt· W3117665311 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Samuel Ponsoni, Frederico Daia Firmiano

Bibliographic record

Venuerevista Linguasagem · 2020
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Political Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapital (architecture)SociologyPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo tem como objetivo  fazer uma analise teorico-discursiva, de base materialista, para compreender formas de imbricamento entre discursos do capital  e os discursos de Jair Bolsonaro, enquanto sujeito porta-voz para e sobre a populacao brasileira e enquanto o responsavel pelos negocios da burguesia no Estado.Para tanto, tomamos como fundamentacao teoricas os estudos marxistas de  Meszaros(2009), as criticas e compreensoes sobre sujeito e razao neoliberal de Dardot e Laval(2017) e a categoria analitico-discursiva de porta-voz, de Pecheux(1990). Nosso material de analise foram discursos proferidos por Bolsonaro, em diversos espacos midiaticos, ao longo da pandemia causada pela COVID-19. Assim, responder a essas questoes se faz o principal objetivo deste texto.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuerevista LinguasagemSame topicSocial and Political IssuesFrench-language works237,207