MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Anny Dayan Rosenman, Les Alphabets de la Shoah. Survivre, témoigner, écrire

2009· article· fr· W311768883 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueQuestions de communication · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nautical Research Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

C'est sous la forme d'un triptyque qu'Anny Dayan Rosenman offre une lecture de textes de survivants d'une Histoire o fut dpass un seuil de violence et de barbarie jusque-l jamais atteint. Textes qui interrogent les pouvoirs du langage, de la littrature, textes qui luttent -souvent douloureusement -avec l'ange de l'criture . Dans cette tude la frontire de plusieurs disciplines (littrature, histoire, psychanalyse), elle nous initie ce qu'elle nomme magnifiquement les Alphabets de la Shoah . l'origine de cet alphabet, trois figures qui s'engendrent l'une l'autre tout en gardant la mmoire de la prcdente : le survivant, le tmoin, l'crivain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it