MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3117733540 · doi:10.4095/321455

Surficial geology, Cape Dobbs, Nunavut, parts of NTS 46-E

2020· report· en· W3117733540 on OpenAlexaffabout
I Randour, I McMartin, J E Campbell, L A Dredge

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapeGeologyArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Cape Dobbs map area was located under the Keewatin Ice Divide during the last glaciation; as a result, the nature of surficial materials and direction of ice flow differ on either side of Wager Bay. South of Wager Bay, bedrock outcrops glacially scoured to the southeast are interspersed with till deposits or, below the marine limit at ~140 m a.s.l., thin marine sediments and reworked till. North of Wager Bay, north-northeastward-trending streamlined landforms underlain by thick till are predominant in the north; they are part of an ice-streaming flow towards Rae Isthmus. In the rest of the area, the northward landforms are largely obliterated by late east-trending streamlined landforms towards Roes Welcome Sound, as a result of drawdown and marine incursion in Hudson Bay. Areas below the marine limit at 135 to 145 m are characterized by bare bedrock, modified bouldery till surfaces, and esker ridges, interspersed with thin marine sediments and raised beaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.103

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and Exploration→French-language works237,207→