Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phenomenology explores phenomena, that in one way or another, are present to humans as and in lived experiences.A lived experience is the sensed contact with what is outside oneself; although what is outside oneself, as and in experience, is always subjectively lived by the person experiencing the moment.As human beings we cannot not relate to what is outside us in an inside way.That is, as subjects, we, in some way or another, sense or become aware cognitively or non-cognitively of the other, the thing, the situation, or the event.Existence is a human condition even more basic than plurality (Arendt 1958), although the two happen simultaneously to the human being.Said more directly, as human beings we exist among others, things, situations, events, nature, culture -we are immersed in them -therefore, we cannot experience outside of existence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.016 | 0.062 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.013 | 0.024 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".