MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3117911693 · doi:10.25071/2291-5796.85

Power, Discourse and Resistance in Mental Health Care

2020· article· en· W3117911693 on OpenAlex
Dave Holmes, Amélie Perron

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueWitness The Canadian Journal of Critical Nursing Discourse · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsResistance (ecology)Power (physics)Mental health careMental healthPsychologySociologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We are both delighted to introduce this special issue of Witness: The Canadian Journal of Critical Nursing Discourse exploring some of the ways that current discourses in mental health care can produce and reinforce precarious mental health conditions, including emotional distress, that create damaging subjectivities for those who are trapped one way or the other in the psychiatric apparatus.The lived-experience of patients is often characterized by traumatic experience even within our healthcare system, leading to exacerbated psychological difficulties, stigmatization, marginalization, exclusion and various forms of violence.The papers included in this special issue seek to make visible alternative and critical discourses (and practices) that challenge harmful processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.852

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it