MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Power System Online Sensitivity Identification Based on Lasso Algorithm

2020· article· en· W3117985334 on OpenAlexaff
Weike Mo, Jiaqing Lv, Mirostaw Pawlak, U.D. Annakkage, Haoyong Chen, Yi‐Ping Phoebe Chen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlgorithmLasso (programming language)Context (archaeology)Computer scienceSensitivity (control systems)Dimension (graph theory)Electric power systemPower (physics)Generator (circuit theory)Oscillation (cell signaling)MathematicsEngineeringElectronic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper utilizes modern statistical and machine learning methodology to identify the sensitivity of the power system oscillation mode. The deviation of the electromechanical oscillation mode is formulated as a function of power deviation of the generators and loads as well as voltage deviation of buses in the entire power system from the base case. The celebrated Lasso algorithm is implemented to solve this high-dimension modeling problem. By the nature of the L <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sub> design, the Lasso algorithm can automatically render a sparse solution, and by eliminating redundant features, it provides desirable prediction power. The resultant model processes a simple structure, and it is easily interpretable. The precision of our sparse modeling framework is demonstrated in the context of an IEEE 50-Generator 145-Bus power network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.420

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207