Hunting for Quaternary Faults in Eastern Canada: A Critical Appraisal of Two Potential Candidates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This study documents two potential neotectonic features in the seismically active St. Lawrence estuary and western part of the Gulf of St. Lawrence of Quebec, Canada. Historically, the region is the locus of series of damaging earthquakes, including the 1663 M 7 earthquake, which suggests the occurrence of coseismic surface ruptures beneath the St. Lawrence River. In the western Gulf of St. Lawrence (Lower St. Lawrence seismic zone), a potential fault scarp identified on a vintage seismic profile has been investigated through high-resolution seismic and multibeam bathymetry data. On the seafloor, the scarp corresponds to an ∼1.8 m high (maximum) feature that is located above a buried escarpment of the Paleozoic bedrock. Holocene units are draping over the escarpment on one profile, but are possibly cut on two others. The scarp meets several of the criteria generally associated with neotectonic features. However, a close look at the data indicates that the staircase geometry of the top of the bedrock and its expression at the surface is linked, at least partially, with the presence of an erosion-resistant unit. This makes a neotectonic reactivation possible but not proven. In the Tadoussac area, ∼40 km north of the Charlevoix seismic zone, the offshore extension of the St. Laurent fault corresponds to an ∼110 m high bathymetric escarpment with well-preserved triangular facets. Such “fresh” morphology is unique in the St. Lawrence River Estuary and may attest to Quaternary displacements, yet other interpretations may also explain the unusual preservation of the escarpment. These two case studies illustrate the difficulty to unambiguously document Holocene fault scarps, even in the marine domain in which the sedimentary succession is generally continuous.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".