Beyond submodular maximization via one-sided smoothness
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The multilinear framework for submodular maximization was developed to achieve a tight $$1-1/e$$ 1 - 1 / e approximation for maximizing a monotone submodular function subject to a matroid constraint, including as special case the submodular welfare problem. The framework has a continuous optimization step (solving the multilinear extension of a submodular function) and a rounding part (rounding a fractional solution to an integral one). We extend both parts to provide a framework for a wider array of applications. The continuous part works for a more general class of continuous functions parameterized by a new smoothness parameter $$\sigma $$ σ . A twice differential function F is called $$\sigma $$ σ -one-sided-smooth ( $$\sigma $$ σ -OSS) if its second derivatives are bounded as follows: $$\frac{1}{2}u^T\nabla ^2 F(x) u \le \sigma \cdot \frac{\Vert u\Vert _1}{\Vert x\Vert _1} u^T \nabla F(x)$$ 1 2 u T ∇ 2 F ( x ) u ≤ σ · ‖ u ‖ 1 ‖ x ‖ 1 u T ∇ F ( x ) for all $$u,x\ge 0$$ u , x ≥ 0 , $$x\ne 0$$ x ≠ 0 . For $$\sigma =0$$ σ = 0 this includes previously studied continuous DR-Submodular functions as well as quadratics defined by copositive matrices. We give a modification of the continuous greedy algorithm which finds a solution for maximizing a monotone $$\sigma $$ σ -OSS F over a polytope in the non-negative orthant; the solution approximates the optimum to within factors which are functions of $$\sigma $$ σ which depend on additional properties. Interestingly, $$\sigma $$ σ -OSS functions arise as the multilinear extensions of set functions associated with several well-studied diversity maximization problems: $$\max f(S) = \sum _{i,j \in S} A_{ij} : |S| \le k$$ max f (
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".