MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3118218782

Ultra-High Dimensional Single-Index Quantile Regression

2020· article· en· W3118218782 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCityU Scholars · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndex (typography)Quantile regressionStatisticsRegressionMathematicsQuantileEconometricsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider a flexible semiparametric single-index quantile regression model where the number of covariates may be ultra-high dimensional, and the number of the relevant covariates is potentially diverging. The approach is particularly appealing to uncover the complex heterogeneity in high-dimensional data, incorporate nonlinearity and potential interaction, avoid the curse of dimensionality, and allow different variables to be included at different quantile levels. We estimate the unknown function via polynomial splines nonparametrically and adopt a nonconvex penalty function to identify the sparse variable set. We further extend it to partially linear single-index quantile model where both the single-index components in the nonparametric term and the partially linear component scan be in ultra-high dimension. However, a number of major challenges arise in developing both theory and computation: (a) The model is highly nonlinear in single-index coefficients because the high-dimensional single-index covariates are embedded inside the unknown flexible function. (b) The data are ultra-high dimensional where the dimension of the single-index covariates (<i>P<sub>n</sub>)</i> is diverging or even in the exponential order of sample size <i>n</i>. (c) The objective function is non-smooth for quantile regression. (d) Nonconvex variable selection such as SCAD is adopted for regularization. (e) The extended partially linear single-index quantile models may include both ultra-high dimensional (<i>P<sub>n</sub></i>) single-index covariates and ultra-high dimensional (<i>q<sub>n</sub></i>) partially linear covariates. We develop a novel approach using empirical process techniques in establishing the theoretical properties of the nonconvex penalized estimators for partially linear single-index quantile models and show those estimators indeed possess the oracle property in ultra-high dimensional setting. We propose an efficient algorithm to circumvent the computational challenges. The results of Monte Carlo simulations and an application to gene expression data demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed models and estimation method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it