MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3118268695 · doi:10.54330/afm.132002

Locally uniform domains and extension of bmo functions

2023· article· en· W3118268695 on OpenAlexafffund
Almaz Butaev, Galia Dafni

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales Fennici Mathematici · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Harmonic Analysis Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of the Fraser Valley
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCentre de Recherches Mathématiques
KeywordsBounded mean oscillationExtension (predicate logic)OmegaDomain (mathematical analysis)Bounded functionMathematicsSpace (punctuation)Scale (ratio)Pure mathematicsOscillation (cell signaling)CombinatoricsGeometryMathematical analysisPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We prove that for a domain \(\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^n\), being \((\epsilon,\delta)\) in the sense of Jones is equivalent to being an extension domain for bmo, the nonhonomogeneous version of the space of functions of bounded mean oscillation on \(\Omega\). Such domains, which can be identified as local versions of uniform domains (defined by requiring the presence of length cigars between nearby points), allow a definition of bmo\((\Omega)\) in terms of "small" and "large" cubes contained in \(\Omega\), where the scale is closely tied to the geometry of the domain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.696

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales Fennici MathematiciSame topicAdvanced Harmonic Analysis ResearchFrench-language works237,207