Ultra‐Bright and Stable Pure Blue Light‐Emitting Diode from O, N Co‐Doped Carbon Dots
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The pure blue light‐emitting diodes (LEDs) play a key role in the application of solid display and illumination. Most of pure blue LEDs reported so far, are based on semiconductor quantum dots and metal complex, involving heavy metal elements. Here, the fabrication of O, N co‐doped carbon dots (CDs) by a hydrothermal method from perylene‐3,4,9,10‐tetracarboxylic dianhydride and 2,3‐diaminophenazine is shown. These CDs show strong photoluminescence (PL) emission peaked at 447 nm (in ethanol) with absolute PL quantum yields of 88.9%. They are then doped into poly(vinyl carbazole) to form the active emission layer in the pure blue CDs LEDs. The electroluminescence emission of these CDs LEDs is centered at 452 nm with Commission Internationale d'Eclairage (CIE) coordinates of (0.14, 0.10). Moreover, the pure blue CDs LEDs show a high external quantum efficiency of 2.114%, high brightness of 648 cd m –2 , long half‐lifetime (T 50 ) of 200 h, and a favorable current efficiency of 2.2 cd A −1 . This work opens a new way to develop cost‐effective, environmental‐friendly, and high‐efficient metal‐free pure blue LEDs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it