MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3118389024 · doi:10.1139/bcb-2020-0543

EDTA as a chelating agent in quantitative <sup>1</sup>H-NMR of biologically important ions

2021· article· en· W3118389024 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Emmanuel Mathuthu, A. Janse van Rensburg, Dean Du Plessis, Shayne Mason

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChelationEthylenediaminetetraacetic acidChemistryElectronegativityIonProton NMRBiological activityNMR spectra databaseBiomoleculeNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyTitrationChemical shiftInorganic chemistryStereochemistrySpectral linePhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryIn vitroBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biologically important ions such as Ca, K, Mg, Fe, and Zn play major roles in numerous biological processes, and their homeostatic balance is necessary for the maintenance of cellular activities. Sudden and severe loss in homeostasis of just one biologically important ion can cause a cascade of negative effects. The ability to quickly, accurately, and reliably quantify biologically important ions in samples of human bio-fluids is something that has been sorely lacking within the field of metabolomics. 1H-NMR spectra. The foundation of our investigation was the a-priori knowledge that free ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) produces two clear single peaks on 1H-NMR spectra, and that EDTA chelated to different ions produces unique 1H-NMR spectral patterns due to 3D conformational changes in the chemical structure of chelated-EDTA and varying degrees of electronegativity. The aim of this study was to develop and test a 1H-NMR-based method, with application specifically to the field of metabolomics, to quantify biologically important ions within the physiological pH range of 6.50–7.50 using EDTA as a chelating agent. Our method produced linear, accurate, precise, and repeatable results for Ca, Mg, and Zn; however, K and Fe did not chelate with EDTA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesFrench-language works237,207