MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3118484053 · doi:10.4000/extremeorient.2457

Presents and Tribute: Exploration of the Presents Given to the Qianlong Emperor by the British Macartney Embassy

2019· article· en· W3118484053 on OpenAlexaff
Fuxiang Guo 郭福祥

Bibliographic record

VenueExtrême-Orient Extrême-Occident · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChinese history and philosophy
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmperorTributeChinaHistoryGovernment (linguistics)Ancient historyLawPolitical sciencePhilosophyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Presents and Tribute: Exploration of the Presents Given to the Qianlong Emperor by the British Macartney EmbassyIn 1793, the British government sent a major diplomatic mission to China led by Lord Macartney. According to past interpretations of this, these presents received the full attention of neither the Qianlong emperor nor his court officials. However, this was not actually the case, and a host of Qing court archival documents reveal that great pains were taken to ensure that these precious gifts were conserved appropriately, and some of them even survive today.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.302
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExtrême-Orient Extrême-OccidentSame topicChinese history and philosophyFrench-language works237,207