MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3118494300 · doi:10.4000/insitu.30031

Le modèle vivant, patrimoine absent des écoles d’art académiques

2021· article· fr· W3118494300 on OpenAlexaff
Morwena Joly-Parvex

Bibliographic record

VenueIn Situ · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Identity and Heritage
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le patrimoine pédagogique conservé dans les écoles d’art issues des anciennes écoles académiques aurait tendance à laisser penser que l’essentiel de la transmission se joue dans la copie d’après les modèles, antiques ou modernes. C’est oublier qu’au fondement de la pédagogie du dessin telle qu’elle est conçue en France se trouve l’étude d’après le modèle vivant. Une école de l’observation de la nature qui n’a cessé de lutter contre l’hégémonie du modèle antique favorisée par les moulages produits en importante quantité au xixe siècle. Il est primordial de connaître l’histoire de ce patrimoine absent avant de concevoir une éventuelle muséographie du patrimoine des écoles d’art.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.016
Scholarly communication0.0100.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIn SituSame topicCultural Identity and HeritageFrench-language works237,207