MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Влияние инновационных самостоятельных физических тренировок на липидный обмен у больных, перенесших инфаркт миокарда

2014· article· ru· W31185011 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Грец Георгий Николаевич, Бухтеева Екатерина Витальевна

Bibliographic record

VenueУченые записки университета им. П.Ф. Лесгафта · 2014
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Health and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOntario Ministry of Research, Innovation and ScienceCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNorges ForskningsrådGovernment of OntarioPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsPhysical therapyMedicineRehabilitationPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PROSPERO CRD42017067514.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.403
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueУченые записки университета им. П.Ф. ЛесгафтаSame topicCardiac Health and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207