Multihop V2U Path Availability Analysis in UAV-Assisted Vehicular Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The work presented in this article aims at improving the ground vehicle connectivity in the context of an intermittent vehicle-to-UAV (V2U) communication scenario where vehicles opportunistically establish time-limited connectivity with passing by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) serving as flying base stations responsible for routing incoming vehicle data over backbone networks and/or the Internet. As opposed to existing work in the literature where vehicles are only allowed to establish direct connectivity with in-range UAVs, this work aims at also exploiting the possible formation of vehicular clusters and, hence, the feasibility of intervehicular communications to establish multihop paths connecting source vehicles to destination UAVs. A mathematical model is presented for the purpose of capturing the nodal (i.e., vehicles and UAVs) mobility dynamics and derive an expression for the overall V2U connectivity probability as well as the overall average vehicle connection time. Extensive simulations are conducted in order to adduce the validity and accuracy of the proposed model and provide further insights into the connectivity sensibility to fundamental system parameters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it