MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3118552401 · doi:10.1109/cdc42340.2020.9303802

A Tractable Mean Field Game Model for the Analysis of Crowd Evacuation Dynamics

2020· article· en· W3118552401 on OpenAlexaff
Noureddine Toumi, Roland P. Malhamé, Jérôme Le Ny

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEvacuation and Crowd Dynamics
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalGroup for Research in Decision Analysis
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNash equilibriumPopulationComputer scienceGame theoryApplied mathematicsMathematical optimizationPopulation modelField (mathematics)Property (philosophy)Mathematical economicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A fixed time horizon evacuation model for a large population of confined agents is proposed within the mean field games framework. Unlike previously proposed models relying on simulations or partial differential equation analysis, the proposed model remains linear in the individual agent dynamics and quadratic in the cost functions, ultimately dictating the agents' motion. We use negative definite matrices in the cost function to reflect congestion effect during evacuations. This leads to Riccati equations that generically display a finite escape time. Therefore, we develop an existence theory for the infinite population mean field game based equilibrium dynamics, and establish its Nash property for a large but finite population of agents. Simulation results illustrating the numerical behavior of the model are presented with stress effect and different social interaction scenarios such as congestion and crowd following behavior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEvacuation and Crowd DynamicsFrench-language works237,207